Category: Consulting Strategies

  • When To Fire A Client

    When To Fire A Client

    Recent events have me thinking about the pros and cons of when to fire a client. It is often a difficult decision to make and even more complicated than accepting a contract or customer. The challenge in accepting a customer includes questions such as whether you can take on the additional work or the profitability of the work. Once you land a customer, you are used to that revenue and level of work. Yes, even if that work includes headaches.

    Unprofitable? Fire A Client

    While there are challenges to it, a client that is not profitable is the easiest to get rid of. There is a bottom line to consider and a black or white decision. The larger obstacle is deciding to get rid of a profitable client but a pain. We all know a customer like this. They do the ‘right” thing and pay bills on time. However, they constantly disrupt plans, cause us to stress, or give us steady fodder for complaints. First, let’s assume we are not merely whining. That is not only possible but is something I see more often than I want to admit. Yes, even when I am the none doing the whining. Next, we need to evaluate the cost of the stress or other negative impact.

    Is This self-inflicted?

    Once we have decided this is not about profit or paying bills, we need to assess the source of the stress honestly. In IT, there are many reasons for us to experience stress in a project. These include timeframes, deadlines, technology platforms, version hell, and normal interpersonal challenges. In my experience, the technology challenges are worth working through. You will see these with other customers. Better yet, a solution that reduces obstacles inherent to a technology platform is re-usable and can win future clients. The steps required for these solutions can be painful. However, the reward can be substantial and worth the temporary stress.

    While it takes two to tango, I have found that we can often place the majority of interpersonal challenges among customers and vendors on one side or the other. Let’s start with the case where we are the problem. This situation can arise when a project is outside of our skillset, goes beyond our resources, or is generally not to our liking. The quick solution in these cases might be termed as “suck it up, buttercup.” However, that may not be the best approach. While we all have some level of ‘grunt work” or other unpleasantness to handle as part of our job, that is not always required. When we have a customer taking us in a direction that does not suit us, it is worthwhile to send them to another vendor. Happy workers are more productive. Why waste our good workers on things that drain them without due cause. Profit is not enough. Make sure the overall benefit is there for any given project.

    They Are A Toxic Client

    The heading for this section is a bit harsh. A bad client is not necessarily toxic. Nevertheless, most bad clients have some toxicity in their company that makes them a challenge. The flaw may be in their communication, culture, or just an individual. We will leave the last option for last. When this problem is the client, it is worthwhile to assess how much pain and suffering they cause. Likewise, we need to assess any positives that may come from a successful project. Sometimes success in a bad situation can be a game-changer for our company’s success. On the other hand, a doomed project can sink an enterprise. We need to make sure we can overcome the challenges and be legitimately successful if we move forward.

    Do Not Be A Quitter

    I have known people to give up on marriages and long-term friendships over minor things, but not customers. It almost goes unsaid that we should not fire a client too hastily. In my experience, a customer is held on to longer than they should instead of the other extreme. That being said, a difficult project or situation is not enough to turn them away once we have started. The focus should be on whether or not the customer relationship can be successful. Likewise, there is some point where it has to be profitable to both parties. When you take a loss with a customer for no sound reason, then it is simply charity. Nevertheless, we should not walk away abruptly. Even a bad relationship deserves closure. Please find a way to transition them to self-sufficiency or another vendor that has a (preferably better) chance of success. You will not regret it.

    The Value Of Loyalty

    Before we wrap up these thoughts, I feel loyalty is worth a mention. Some situations go sour or bad over time, and those that experience bumpy roads or obstacles. A vendor that takes on those periods of challenge and sticks with their customers even in the bad times will often find rewards at the end. These rewards may not come from that difficult customer, but they do come. There are lessons learned and “brownie points” that we earn when we are known to be a vendor that cares about our customers. Think of major brands, and you will often find that sentiment buried somewhere in the branding. People buy from those they know, like, and trust. Trust is earned in the trenches, not through the easy times.

    A Way Forward

    All of these thoughts boil down to some steps you can take to assess whether to fire a client.

    • Is it us or them?
    • Can a solution be found that benefits both parties?
    • What are the benefits of staying as opposed to firing them?
    • How do we extract ourselves from the relationship with a minimum of damage and ill will?

    These may seem simple. However, each of the above bullet points can be very nuanced and complex.

  • Making Fixed Bid Projects A Success

    Making Fixed Bid Projects A Success

    I am not a fan of fixed bid projects in general. That distaste is such that I have turned some down in the past. However, sometimes we need to step into one of these arrangements. It is worth considering the actions we need to take to keep such projects fair to all parties. Here are some lessons I have learned from personal experience and from others that have entered into these agreements. The successes and failures are excellent teachers for this billing strategy.

    Fixed Bid Struggles

    I want to start the discussion by highlighting some of the weaknesses of this process that we want to overcome. The first is that it pits parties against each other. It is in the best interest of the customer to get as much into the project as they can while the provider will want the least in it. Ideally, there will be a “just right” amount of work in the project, so the work that is done matches the compensation. This goal highlights another weakness. The vendor will want to “pad” the price to cover overages while the customer will focus on the lowest cost. Thus, any time the work is not highly defined, the two sides are hedging their risk for the work-compensation ratio. Finally, changes are difficult for these projects. Every little change will potentially require the vendor to be paid more, and the customer will want to argue against that. This situation often triggers conversations about what is a “bug” and features that were implied or assumed.

    Reduce The Competition

    The first and foremost issue we want to remove is pitting the parties against each other. The best way to resolve this is to get the pieces defined and set in place from the start. We want to set expectations for everyone involved. Our challenge lies in reducing (or at least identifying) the risks involved in a project. Thus, it is best to “chop up” the project into smaller pieces that can be easily defined and assessed. That leads to milestones. I think these are the key to successful fixed bid projects. Likewise, the are others that agree with me.

    Milestones are an excellent way to reduce a complex project into smaller, more manageable pieces. Likewise, each milestone has reduced overall risk and allows the parties to make adjustments as the project proceeds. Each step along the way will have a set of deliverables, a time frame, and a related cost. This process can still work within a greater fixed bid budget for time and cost. However, it will highlight issues sooner in the process so the parties can open discussions before one or both are in an untenable situation.

    The Sum Of The Parts

    The “just right” amount of work balanced against the requirements can be challenging to assess with a large project. When the work is simplified into a series of milestones, it becomes easier to find that balance. The focus for both functions and meeting them becomes smaller and more likely to comprehend. For example, think about your favorite application that has multiple top-level menus. Most Word Processing and Spreadsheet applications fall into this category. If you were to assess how that application meets a set of requirements, it is far easier to do so a menu item at a time than trying to look for features across all items. This thought process is not rocket science; we need to consider that adding items adds complexity and expands focus. This challenge is no different than discussing a single decision as opposed to a series of them. There are flow and side effects that come into play far more often in an extensive system than those milestones. These can make it harder for all parties to do their respective jobs.

    Managing Changes

    Change requests are always a challenge as the project progresses. There are bugs, requirements changes, and scope changes that can fall into this category. Typically, bugs are part of the fixed amount while the other two may require a fixed addition. I have found it helps to start with a bid and expectations that includes some minor changes. When you take this approach you get to avoid “nickel and dime” issues where large amounts of time are spent haggling through each item. When this happens, a project can slow to a crawl. There is always the option of pushing changes off until a project completes. However, there are times when that is not realistic. Of course, adding in some “buffer” for changes can make it hard to do an apple to apple comparison of project bids.

    Changes are more of a challenge when they are done in a granular matter. The better your ability (on both sides) to group these tasks into a bundle, the less the headache. When you avoid minute details of tasks, you avoid long conversations with little benefit. This also allows for “buffer” required per job to be rolled into a total buffer amount that will often be far less than the sum of the individual items. There is a form of averaging of risk that can be applied. Think of it as being able to make fewer estimations and risk assessments. It is not much different than an insurance company assessing risk across a large number of customers rather than having to spend time on each individual.

    The Bottom Line

    When you think about an hourly rate or time and materials, it is similar to milestones of an hour (or the time block paid). However, there are not always going to be a deliverable for those milestones other than time spent. Ideally, we have two goals. The first is to complete the overall project. The second is to complete the steps required to reach the primary objective. We can use milestones to bundle together hours of work into a deliverable and reduce risk on both sides. Each party just needs to stay open to the idea of adjustments along the way.

  • Thank You For Your Business – Customer Appreciation Tips

    Thank You For Your Business – Customer Appreciation Tips

    Each year we enter a season of giving and thankfulness as it winds down.  One of the things that come out of this is a sort of season of customer appreciation.  The challenge in this attitude is finding the best way to show our appreciation without coming off too sappy.  We want to thank our customers and build loyalty, not overwhelm them with more selling.

    To Brand or Not To Brand

    The first decision to make with this customer appreciation “gifts” is whether we slap a logo or other brand label on them.  Do we give our customers a notebook with our logo on it? A nice drinking glass with our motto? Or some other knick-knack that is a glaring reminder of who gave it?  I think the answer to this question can be found in our other seasonal gifts.

    Do you buy your relatives a gift stamped with your name?  Do those gifts you give, scream the source of them?  No, you often give something that is about the recipient instead.  Now, there is a consideration of how to handle gift-giving from a company.  When you stamp your label on an item, it can be filed under marketing.  I think this is understood by most people, so it is not seen negatively.  Therefore, if you want to put a logo on an item, try to make it subtle.  There are good examples of this all over where a typical logo is replaced with one for marketing purposes.  You can fall back on the golden rule (sort of) in this situation.  Ask yourself if the emblem is unobtrusive or subtle enough that you would use the gift in public without feeling “odd.”

    Does Size Matter?

    The size or value of the gifts is always part of the consideration as well.  There are industries where limits are placed on gifts, and that makes it easy.  However, I find it far more common to be in a sort of Wild West of gift valuation.  In these situations, I think it is a heart decision.  How generous do you want to be?

    It is easy to use some sort of percentage of profits from a customer as a rule of thumb.  For example, take five percent of the profits earned and use that as a measure of what to give.  That feels a bit cold and calculated though.  I think you will find a better response when you focus on utility first and then find a value that fits.  A personal example was a gift of laptop bags for customers.  It started with the idea of those backpacks being desirable.  Heck, I even got one for myself that I use daily.  Then I looked at options that fit my rough budget.  The focus was the gift, not the sales appeal or monetary valuation of it.  This approach helps build a rapport as it shows thoughtfulness instead of simply a business relationship.  Customers like to be appreciated for more than just their wallet.

    The Moment of Truth

    The last facet of gift-giving I want to visit is the delivery.  I think we all agree that hand-delivering the gifts is always best.  It is a personal touch and a chance to show our sincerity.  You might also see it as a chance to sell to your customers.  I have seen this a lot from consulting companies.  The gift then becomes an excuse to get a few minutes of time from decision makers.  I recommend you avoid this at all costs.  You will get a lot more loyalty out of giving a gift with no strings (or sales) attached than one more shot at a sale.

    Business and personal life often coincide in the modern world.  The season of giving is no different.  Just make sure you come at it with the right attitude.